Section 3 of the June 2007 LSAT offers a mystery: Why the hell would Jimmy’s gas bills increase after installing a new, “highly efficient” gas water heater? Seems like his gas bills should go down, right? Well, no. Not necessarily. Not if you’re arguing properly.
Archive for the ‘Explanation Questions’ Category
Section 2 of the June 2007 LSAT wraps up with a mystery. We’re told that the French academy of art was “a major financial sponsor” of both painting and sculpture in France in the 19th century. We’re also told that the academy “discouraged innovation in the arts.” But then we’re told a puzzling fact: French sculpture during that period showed little innovation, while French painting showed a lot of innovation. Why would this be?



Nathan Fox
