Having reached question 20 in section 2 of the June 2007 LSAT, we are well into the realm of the more-difficult questions. These questions aren’t impossible, of course, but we can expect that the questions at this point in the section are going to be quite a bit more difficult than the questions at the beginning of the section. A reminder about section strategy is in order here: Whatever you do, get most of the questions in the beginning of the section right. If you have to guess on a few at the end of the section, so be it. The worst strategy I can imagine is to rush through the beginning of the section, making careless mistakes on easy questions, so that you’ll have time to devote to the far more difficult questions at the end of the section–questions you’re more likely to miss even with unlimited time. So slow down and get the earlier ones right. If you make it to the end of the section that’s great, but it’s not necessary to get a solid score. (I see students all the time who finish the section, but only get 10 right. These people would obviously benefit from slowing down and focusing on accuracy, even if they end up guessing on a few at the end.)
Archive for the ‘Strategy of Argumentation Questions’ Category
Meet your personal guide...
Nathan Fox
I am a UC Hastings law grad, Babson MBA grad, and your ticket to a higher LSAT score. I'll inspire you, entertain you, and help you see the test the way I do. My students rave about me, and their LSAT scores show dramatic improvement. Learn more about why you should choose Fox Test Prep.
Now Available

Cheating The LSAT: The Fox Test Prep Guide to a Real LSAT, Volume 1
by Nathan Fox
$34.95
With his new book, Cheating the LSAT, Nathan Fox shows you how to make that statement a reality. In his down-to-earth, often irreverent style, he walks you through an actual LSAT, demystifying the confusing world of logic games, reading comprehension, and logical reasoning.
Recent Posts
- “The Law School Decision Game”
- LSAT prep in New York City — and a scholarship offer
- Harvard cheaper than Cal State–Ain’t my problem
- June 2007 LSAT, III, #7
- June 2007 LSAT, III, #6
- June 2007 LSAT, III, #5
- Winning “The Law School Admission Game”
- What “necessary assumption” means
- June 2007 LSAT, III, #4
- June 2007 LSAT, Game 3, #12
Categories
- Frequently Asked Questions
- June 2007 LSAT
- LSAT Fundamentals
- LSAT Logic Games
- LSAT Logical Reasoning
- Agree/Disagree Questions
- Cause and Effect Questions
- Complete the Argument Questions
- Diagramming Questions
- EXCEPT questions
- Explanation Questions
- Flaw Questions
- Flawed Pattern of Reasoning Questions
- Flaws in the so-called "news"
- Main Conclusion Questions
- Matching Pattern Questions
- Must be True Questions
- Necessary Assumption Questions
- Principle Questions
- Role Played in the Argument Questions
- Strategy of Argumentation Questions
- Strengthen Questions
- Sufficient Assumption Questions
- Weaken Questions
- LSAT teachers elsewhere
- Uncategorized



